HCA 322 Week 2 Discussion Question 1 Patient Rights
To purchase this material click
below link:-
For More Tutorials Click Below link:-
Patient Rights. Your
instructor will assign you one of the following options by Day 1 of Week Two.
In your initial discussion post, address the questions associated with your
assigned option. Include the option number in the subject/title line of your
post. You must use at least two scholarly sources in your post. Respond to at
least two classmates using the required response prompt for their option (e.g.,
if your initial post was Option 1, then respond to posts from Option 2 and 3 or
if your initial post was Option 2, then respond to posts from Option 1 and 3).
Your initial post should be at least 250 words; your response post should be at
least 100 words.
Option 1:
Patient Rights-Euthanasia
For this option, you will take a look at the ethics
surrounding euthanasia (intentionally ending a life to relieve pain or
suffering) and the right to live versus right to die arguments that were
present within the Teri Schiavo and Karen Ann Quinlan cases. To being, view the
Craig Ewart at Dignitas (Switzerland), The Terri Schiavo Story, and the
Euthanasia-Whose life is it, anyway? videos. Then, research and discuss the
topic of euthanasia. For your initial post, pick one case (either Teri Schiavo
or Karen Ann Quinlan) and one side of the argument (either right to live or
right to die) and explain how you would have handled this particular case
differently in order to protect the patient. Your initial post must be a
minimum of 250 words.
Option 1 Required
Response: Regardless of your personal beliefs, respond to your
classmate’s post by considering the opposite side of their argument. Explain
what the other side’s logic was in relation to the same case your classmate
chose (e.g., if your classmate selected right to live, give the rationale
behind the right to die argument for that case). Each response must be a
minimum of 100 words.
Option 2:
Patient Rights-Assisted Suicide
Review the Dr. Jack Kevorkian’s “60
Minutes” Interview video. Research and discuss physician assisted suicide.
Pick a side on this argument and explain why you selected that particular side
using scholarly research to support your decision. Explain how this view would
address the case of Dr. Kevorkian? In your post, explain whether you believe
Dr. Kevorkian was a hero or a murderer? (Remember, there is no correct answer
to this question...but support your opinion with research and facts). Your
initial response should be at least 250 words.
Option 2 Required
Response: Regardless of your personal beliefs, respond to your
classmate’s post by considering the opposite side of their argument. Explain
how this approach would affect the outcome for Dr. Kevorkian. For example, if
your classmate responded that Dr. Kevorkian was a hero, respond to their post
by explaining the reasoning behind the view that he was a murderer and what
that would mean for him. What are the ethical principles behind this point of
view? Your response must contain at least 100 words.
Option 3:
Patient Rights and Privacy
Review the Electronic Health Records: Privacy
and Security video. Research and discuss electronic health records (EHR).
Explain how EHR are intended to protect the patient. Discuss any barriers that
may prevent necessary protections. Your initial response should be at least 250
words.
Option 3 Required
Response: Respond to your classmate’s post and explain the concept that
EHR might notbe
able to fully protect the patient. In what ways could this be better or worse
than paper records? Then, refer to the barriers mentioned by your classmate and
describe the potential policies that could reduce those barriers. Your response
must contain at least 100 words.
Comments
Post a Comment